Guide
Pricing & Negotiation
Brands
Influencer marketing liability insurance (media liability insurance) covers financial claims and legal costs arising from the content itself — missing ad disclosure, copyright or trademark infringement, defamation and privacy violations — and it's a separate product from a contract or a morality clause. Two structures exist in practice: brand-side cover (e.g. QBE's US product) and creator-side cover (e.g. Exali's professional indemnity policy, which is also available in Denmark).
Can a creator or a brand insure against the legal claims a sponsored post can trigger? Yes — but it's a different product than most people assume. This article covers what influencer marketing liability insurance actually covers, how it differs from the contractual tools already covered on the Academy, and whether Danish brands and creators genuinely need it.
This is a category explainer from Make Influence, not a recommendation of a specific provider or insurance advice. Talk to an insurer about your specific situation.
Influencer marketing liability insurance (often called media liability insurance) covers financial claims and legal defense costs that arise from the content itself — not from the collaboration or the contract relationship. That's a different kind of protection from the contractual tools already covered on the Academy: a contract fixes what the parties agreed to; a morality clause (part of the brand safety checklist) gives you the right to end the collaboration if the creator behaves badly afterward. Liability insurance instead covers the financial consequence if a third party — a consumer, a competitor, a rights holder — brings a claim against you or the creator based on the content itself.
The market for this kind of insurance is still young, but two named, concrete products show how it's structured in practice today, each with a different focus.
QBE North America launched a dedicated product called "The Influencer" in August 2025 — a media liability policy covering both the brand and the influencer for claims arising from the influencer's promotional content: inadvertent use of unlicensed material, breaches of advertising law, copyright, trademark, defamation and right-of-publicity claims. One distinctive feature: the influencer has to complete a short educational module on media law (copyright, trademark, defamation, advertising best practices) before joining a brand's program. As of this writing, the product is available only to policyholders in the United States, per QBE's own launch materials.
A second, more directly relevant finding for Danish creators and brands: the German insurer Exali sells a professional indemnity policy specifically for influencers, and Denmark is listed — per Exali's own website, checked 24 August 2026 — among the countries where the policy can be purchased. According to Exali, it covers claims arising from missing ad disclosure, copyright/trademark/licensing infringement, breach of confidentiality agreements, cybercrime against the creator's own accounts, and breach of contract. Pricing starts, per Exali's own published rate, from EUR 133.10 net per year for the base cover — a price that rises with revenue and any add-on modules chosen.
Neither product is something Make Influence offers, requires or endorses a specific provider for — they're named here only as examples of how this kind of insurance market is actually structured today.
| Risk | Example |
|---|---|
| Missing ad disclosure | A regulator or consumer body brings a complaint because a sponsored post wasn't correctly labelled |
| Copyright/trademark | The creator used music or imagery in the delivered content without a licence |
| Defamation | The content includes a claim about a competitor or third party that turns out to be defamatory |
| Right of publicity/likeness | The content uses another person's name, image or voice without consent |
| Cybercrime | The creator's account is hacked and a third party suffers a loss as a result |
| Breach of contract | One party breaches the agreement and the other suffers a documentable loss |
It's easy to confuse this insurance with the other protection layers the Academy already covers — but they solve four different problems:
| Tool | What it solves | When it's used |
|---|---|---|
| Contract (the 12 terms) | Fixes what the parties agreed to | Before the collaboration starts |
| Morality clause (part of the brand safety checklist) | Gives the right to end the collaboration over bad conduct | After signing, if the creator behaves badly |
| Product liability allocation (see who's liable for a defective product) | Decides who bears legal liability if the product itself is defective | In co-branded product deals |
| Liability insurance (this article) | Covers the financial consequence of a third-party claim | Once a claim is actually brought |
Liability insurance also isn't the same as directors and officers (D&O) insurance, which covers a company's leadership decisions, not the marketing content itself.
No Danish industry survey exists on how many Danish brands or creators actually carry this kind of insurance today, so the following is Make Influence's own judgement, not a documented fact:
The figures below are invented and for illustration only — not a real customer case.
A Danish creator who works as a self-employed business and runs about 15 paid collaborations a year takes out a professional indemnity policy for DKK 1,200 a year (roughly Exali's lowest published price converted to DKK). During the year, the creator mistakenly uses an audio clip in a post without checking the licence — the rights holder brings a claim for DKK 15,000 in damages plus legal costs. Without insurance, the creator pays the full amount themselves. With the policy, it covers the claim minus any excess, and the total cost for the year is the premium plus the excess — far below the DKK 15,000 the claim was for.
No. A morality clause is a contractual right to end the collaboration — it doesn't cost money and doesn't resolve a financial claim from a third party. Liability insurance covers the actual financial consequence if someone brings a claim.
No. Make Influence neither requires, offers nor recommends a specific insurance provider — that's a decision for the individual creator or brand to make.
It depends entirely on the specific policy and provider — a general business liability policy typically doesn't automatically cover media-related claims like copyright or defamation unless it's specifically included. Check the policy wording directly with the provider.
None found in this research — as of this writing, neither Topdanmark, If nor Tryg has a named, dedicated influencer liability product. Exali (German, but active in Denmark) is the only concrete, named product this article could document as available to Danish creators.
It depends on the specific policy — some media liability products explicitly cover "regulatory/advertising law breaches", but a fine or order from a public authority isn't necessarily the same as a private-party damages claim, and insurance coverage of regulatory sanctions varies significantly. Check this specifically before relying on it.
In our experience, liability insurance is worth considering for creators and brands with meaningful volume and visibility — but it doesn't replace the underlying work: a proper contract, a brand safety assessment and correct ad disclosure catch the vast majority of problems before they ever become an insurance claim. We see the insurance as a last layer of protection, not a substitute for getting the other pieces right first.
Make Influence
Find creators with real audience data, run collaborations in one place, and see clicks and sales per creator while the campaign is live.
Book a demoCreate accountMake Influence
Apply to campaigns from brands that are actively looking, follow your own clicks and sales, and get paid without chasing invoices.
Create creator profileMore creator guidesMake Influence
Briefs, agreed terms, tracking links and results sit together — so brands and creators see the same numbers.
See how it worksBrowse the Academy