Guide
Pricing & Negotiation
Brands
Yes — a payment to an influencer is generally a fully deductible advertising expense, both for corporate income tax and VAT, because the content reaches the influencer's followers: an undefined circle of potential customers (Ligningsloven § 8(1)). If the arrangement instead targets specific, named business contacts, it risks being classified as representation (entertainment) instead: only 25% tax-deductible, and generally no VAT deduction at all.
Yes — a payment to an influencer is generally a fully deductible advertising expense in Denmark, both on your corporate tax return and on your VAT return, because the content reaches the influencer's followers: an undefined circle of potential customers. That follows from Ligningsloven (the Danish Tax Assessment Act) § 8(1) and the general VAT deduction rule in Momsloven § 37. If the arrangement instead targets specific, named business contacts — a dinner or a gift for one particular partner, say — it risks being classified as representation (entertainment) instead: only 25% tax-deductible, and generally no VAT deduction at all. This is general guidance, not tax advice for your specific situation — always confirm the classification with your accountant.
When a business spends money on marketing, there isn't a single deduction rule that covers all of it. Denmark's tax authority, Skattestyrelsen, distinguishes between advertising expenses and representation (entertainment) expenses, and the two carry very different deduction rights — on both income tax and VAT. A payment to an influencer isn't automatically one or the other; what decides it is who the content actually reaches, not the fact that it's labelled "influencer marketing."
Under Ligningsloven § 8(1), advertising expenses incurred to generate sales of goods or services in the current or a later tax year are fully deductible from taxable income. Skattestyrelsen's own guidance defines advertising as expenses typically directed at an undefined circle of customers or potential customers, serving to maintain the business's general reputation or advance its interests by making it known and favourably regarded.
Representation expenses, by contrast, are directed at specific, named business contacts — for example to close a deal or to build or maintain a relationship with a particular customer. Denmark's Supreme Court underlined exactly this distinction in SKM2013.378.HR: an arrangement limited to a defined circle of people is fundamentally different from ordinary advertising and must be treated as representation, with the reduced deduction rights that brings.
A sponsored post, video or article that an influencer shares with their followers typically reaches an undefined circle — that's advertising in the legal sense. Pay an "influencer" who is really a named business partner for a private arrangement with no public content, on the other hand, and the payment starts to look like representation.
| Advertising expense | Representation expense | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Undefined circle of (potential) customers — e.g. an influencer's public followers | Specific, named business contacts |
| Income tax deduction | 100% (Ligningsloven § 8(1)) | 25% (Ligningsloven § 8(4)) |
| VAT deduction | Full VAT deduction under Momsloven § 37, if the service is used exclusively for VAT-taxable activity | Generally no VAT deduction at all (Momsloven § 42(1)(5)) — restaurant services are a separate exception with a 25% VAT deduction |
| Typical example | A sponsored post shared publicly with the influencer's followers | A dinner or gift for one named business contact, with no public content |
Classification as advertising decides whether you can deduct the VAT — but the VAT on the invoice itself depends on where the influencer is VAT-registered:
If you pay wholly or partly in product rather than cash, the same test applies to the income tax deduction: if the product is part of a deal that results in content shared publicly with an undefined audience, its value is an advertising expense on the same terms as a cash payment. The VAT picture is more nuanced — there is generally no VAT deduction for ordinary gifts (Momsloven § 42(1)(5)), but samples and ordinary low-value promotional items retain full deduction rights. That line is narrow and depends on the product's value and character — get the specific assessment from your accountant before relying on it for a larger product sponsorship. See gifting vs. paid collaborations for the broader comparison between product gifts and paid deals.
Whether the influencer is Danish or foreign, the invoice needs to give you grounds to document the deduction: both parties' name and address (your CVR number, the influencer's name/CVR), invoice date and number, a description of the service, the amount and — for a Danish, VAT-registered influencer — the VAT base and VAT amount shown separately. The service description should match what the contract actually agreed — see what to put in an influencer contract for what should already be fixed there, so the invoice doesn't need to be reconstructed afterwards.
The figures below are a made-up example to illustrate the point — not a real customer case. Denmark's corporate tax rate is 22%, and the VAT rate is 25%.
Assume you pay a Danish, VAT-registered influencer DKK 15,000 excl. VAT for a sponsored post.
Classified as advertising: The VAT on the invoice (15,000 × 25% = DKK 3,750) is fully deducted as input VAT — it isn't a real cost. The full DKK 15,000 is tax-deductible, saving 15,000 × 22% = DKK 3,300 in corporate tax. The real net cost is 15,000 − 3,300 = DKK 11,700.
Classified as representation: The VAT (DKK 3,750) generally can't be deducted at all and becomes a real cost on top, so the gross amount is 15,000 + 3,750 = DKK 18,750. Only 25% of the DKK 15,000 is tax-deductible, saving just 15,000 × 25% × 22% = DKK 825. The real net cost is 18,750 − 825 = DKK 17,925.
The difference between the two classifications is 17,925 − 11,700 = DKK 6,225 — for exactly the same DKK 15,000 nominal deal. That's the whole reason to get the classification right before the invoice is booked.
This is Make Influence's own operational experience, not a general rule: the large majority of paid influencer collaborations we see — sponsored posts, videos, articles shared publicly with an influencer's followers — fall clearly within the advertising definition, because the entire point of the collaboration is to reach a broad, undefined group of potential customers. The situation that most often creates genuine doubt in practice isn't the ordinary paid campaign, but edge cases like exclusive events or VIP experiences where only a handful of named people attend, before anything is (maybe) posted publicly afterwards. If you're unsure about a specific collaboration, that's the situation worth having assessed separately.
No. It depends on whether the content reaches an undefined circle of followers (advertising) or targets specific, named business contacts (representation). Most ordinary, publicly shared collaborations are advertising.
Yes, in full, if the deal is an advertising expense and your business otherwise carries out VAT-taxable activity (Momsloven § 37). If the deal is representation instead, there's generally no VAT deduction.
The invoicing and VAT mechanics (reverse charge) are the same regardless of whether the payment is advertising or representation — see How to Pay International Influencers for the full walkthrough. The advertising-vs-representation classification still decides whether the Danish VAT you self-account for can be deducted again.
For income tax, yes, on the same terms as a cash payment, if the product is part of a deal for publicly shared content. For VAT, there's generally no deduction for ordinary gifts — only for samples and low-value promotional items. Get the specific assessment from your accountant.
Affiliate influencer marketing in Denmark covers the influencer's own tax and VAT obligations on the income they receive. This article covers the other side: your business's right to deduct the expense you incur.
No, not for this article's test: the advertising-vs-representation deduction question is about who the content reaches, and applies the same way regardless of the influencer's own tax status. But the influencer's own classification decides how they report and are taxed on what you pay them — see employee or self-employed? How Denmark classifies an influencer's income for that side of it.
Make Influence
Find creators with real audience data, run collaborations in one place, and see clicks and sales per creator while the campaign is live.
Book a demoCreate accountMake Influence
Apply to campaigns from brands that are actively looking, follow your own clicks and sales, and get paid without chasing invoices.
Create creator profileMore creator guidesMake Influence
Briefs, agreed terms, tracking links and results sit together — so brands and creators see the same numbers.
See how it worksBrowse the Academy