Guide
Strategy
Brands
YouTube Shorts has two entirely separate income streams: YouTube Partner Program (YPP) ad revenue, which requires 1,000 subscribers plus either 10 million Shorts views in 90 days or 4,000 watch hours in 12 months, and a direct brand deal, which requires neither. From 1 February 2027 the entry thresholds for new applicants double; existing YPP members are unaffected.
YouTube Shorts has two entirely separate income streams that get conflated constantly. One is ad revenue through the YouTube Partner Program (YPP) — a share of a pooled fund, paid by YouTube itself, available only to channels that clear fixed eligibility thresholds. The other is a direct brand deal — a fee negotiated between the brand and the creator, which requires no YPP status at all. From 1 February 2027, YouTube doubles the entry thresholds for new YPP applicants, while existing members are unaffected. Below: how both actually work in 2026, and why one tells you nothing about the other.
Per YouTube's own Help Center, there are two paths into full YPP monetization (ad revenue on both long-form and Shorts, plus Super Thanks, Super Stickers and channel memberships), and a lower "early access" tier that unlocks fan-funding tools only, not Shorts ad revenue:
| Tier | Subscribers | Other requirement | Unlocks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full YPP — Shorts path | 1,000 | 10 million qualified Shorts views in the last 90 days | Ad revenue (incl. Shorts Creator Pool), Super Thanks, Super Stickers, channel memberships |
| Full YPP — long-form path | 1,000 | 4,000 qualified watch hours in the last 12 months | Same as above |
| Early access (fan funding) | 500 | 3 million Shorts views/90 days OR 3,000 watch hours/12 months, plus 3 public uploads in the last 90 days | Super Thanks, Super Stickers, channel memberships only — not Shorts ad revenue |
Only one of the two full-YPP paths needs to be met, not both. YPP and Shorts monetization are also only available in countries YouTube itself supports — if a channel's country isn't on that list, it can't opt in even after clearing the thresholds.
Shorts works structurally differently from long-form ads. Per YouTube's own documentation, ad revenue from the Shorts Feed is pooled monthly into a shared Creator Pool, which is then allocated based on each monetizing creator's share of total "engaged views" among monetizing creators in that country that month. There is no fixed rate per view — only a share of a pool that shifts month to month depending on how many other creators are competing for the same pool.
Music changes the allocation directly: if a Short uses no music, the entire associated ad revenue goes into the Creator Pool. If it uses music, revenue splits between the Creator Pool and music-licensing costs — for a Short using one track, roughly half goes to licensing and half to the Creator Pool, per YouTube's own explanation. Of the resulting Creator Pool, monetizing creators keep 45% — regardless of whether music was used or not; the remaining 55% goes to YouTube, which covers the licensing costs among other things.
The figures below are hypothetical and illustrate only how the Creator Pool model works mechanically — they are not a documented pool size and not a real Make Influence customer case.
Suppose a country's total Shorts Creator Pool for a given month is hypothetically 500,000 kr, and one creator accounts for 2% of all qualifying engaged views among monetizing creators in that country that month: 500,000 kr × 2% = 10,000 kr allocated share, of which the creator keeps 45% = 4,500 kr in ad revenue for the entire month. Compare that with a single brand deal in the same month at an agreed price of 15,000 kr for three Shorts — more than three times that month's total Shorts ad revenue, and paid regardless of what share of the pool the creator's content happens to capture.
YouTube announced the first major changes to Partner Program requirements since 2018 in August 2026, effective 1 February 2027. Per YouTube's own update, entry thresholds double for new applicants, while existing members are unaffected:
| Requirement | Through 31 January 2027 | From 1 February 2027 |
|---|---|---|
| New YPP applicants | 1,000 subscribers + (10 million Shorts views/90 days OR 4,000 watch hours/12 months) | 1,000 subscribers + (20 million Shorts views/90 days OR 8,000 watch hours/365 days) |
| Existing YPP members | — | No change in status — YouTube states explicitly that the update "won't impact creators already in YPP" |
| To keep earning Shorts ad revenue on an ongoing basis | — | Must maintain 10 million qualified Shorts views over the trailing 90 days. Falling below only pauses the Shorts portion of earnings — not long-form revenue or YPP status itself — and it resumes automatically once the view count crosses the threshold again |
YouTube is simultaneously introducing new, not-yet-fully-specified earning opportunities for channels below the Shorts threshold: "bonuses for YouTube Shopping," "production credits for brand deals," and "earnings boosts for cultural trend activations," per YouTube's own Help Center. No specific dollar figures or a formal program name have been published yet — YouTube states eligible creators will get direct notifications as the programs launch. Worth noting for a brand: YouTube itself is naming brand deals as part of its own 2027 retention strategy for smaller channels — which reinforces the point in the next section: sponsorships and the platform's own ad revenue are two separate, but in YouTube's own framing increasingly connected, income lines.
A direct brand deal is not part of YouTube's own payout system. The brand pays the creator outside the Creator Pool, negotiated individually — which means a channel that doesn't meet the YPP thresholds at all (under 1,000 subscribers, for instance) can still land a sponsorship if the audience and content fit the product. The reverse also holds: YPP status is no guarantee a channel is relevant to a given brand — that's still a question of audience and content type, not platform status.
| YPP Shorts Creator Pool | Direct brand deal | |
|---|---|---|
| Who pays | YouTube (via advertisers paying into the Shorts Feed) | The brand, directly to the creator |
| Payment mechanic | Share of a pooled fund, allocated by share of engaged views | Agreed fee, negotiated individually before the work starts |
| Eligibility | Must clear the YPP thresholds (see table above) | None — requires neither YPP status nor a specific subscriber count |
| Predictability | Low — varies with pool size and the number of competing creators | High — the amount is known in advance |
| Requires ad disclosure | No — it isn't advertising for a third party | Yes — see influencer marketing disclosure rules in Denmark and the EU |
IF you're evaluating a Shorts creator for a sponsorship → YPP status isn't a requirement for the deal itself, but it's a useful scale signal: a channel that has cleared 1,000 subscribers and 10 million views/90 days has shown some consistency in output and viewership over time.
IF the creator is already YPP-monetized → remember a brand deal is a separate income stream on top of, not instead of, their Shorts ad revenue — the two don't compete for the same money, and taking a sponsorship doesn't cost them their YPP earnings.
IF you're weighing whether a channel can live on YouTube ad revenue alone → the Creator Pool model means Shorts income is, in practice, far less predictable than an agreed sponsorship fee, regardless of channel size, because it depends on a shared pool rather than a fixed rate.
IF a collaboration spans 1 February 2027 → check whether the creator has accepted the updated YPP terms in Studio, and whether their Shorts view count is holding stably above 10 million/90 days, if part of the arrangement assumes continued access to Shorts ad revenue alongside the sponsorship.
In Make Influence's experience, it's a common misconception among brands that a creator's YouTube Partner Program status says something about how attractive they are as a sponsorship partner. The two are unrelated: YPP status is about what YouTube pays the creator for views on their own content, while a brand deal is about what you agree to pay directly for exposure and content. A channel that isn't YPP-monetized yet can still be a strong sponsorship match if the audience and content fit the product — and conversely, YPP status is no guarantee of relevance. Use the same criteria you'd use for any other platform: relevance, engagement and a unique tracking setup per collaboration, not subscriber count or platform status alone — see gifting vs. paid collaborations and how to brief a creator for performance, not just awareness.
Whether the collaboration is a sponsorship or part of a broader YouTube strategy, the same principle applies as elsewhere in the Academy: track each collaboration separately with a unique link or code — see discount codes vs. tracking links — and don't concentrate the relationship on one platform's rules alone; see reducing platform risk in influencer marketing for what YouTube's own repeated YPP rule changes are an example of.
No — a direct sponsorship is paid by the brand outside YouTube's own payout system, so it requires neither YPP status nor a specific subscriber count.
There's no published, fixed figure from YouTube itself — revenue is allocated as a share of a pooled fund (the Creator Pool), not as a fixed rate per view. Figures that circulate in marketing blogs on the topic carry no disclosed source or methodology and aren't repeated here as fact.
The channel only loses the Shorts portion of ad revenue, not long-form revenue or YPP membership itself, and Shorts earnings resume automatically once the view count crosses the threshold again.
Yes — if a Short doesn't use music, the entire associated ad revenue goes into the Creator Pool. If it uses music, revenue splits between the Creator Pool and music-licensing costs.
No, they take effect 1 February 2027. Existing YPP members aren't subject to the tightened entry requirements, but must accept the updated terms in YouTube Studio by 31 January 2027.
In Make Influence's experience, it's rarely the largest income line for a mid-tier creator — brand deals typically make up a larger and more predictable share of income, because the amount is agreed in advance rather than depending on a shared pool.
Make Influence
Find creators with real audience data, run collaborations in one place, and see clicks and sales per creator while the campaign is live.
Book a demoCreate accountMake Influence
Apply to campaigns from brands that are actively looking, follow your own clicks and sales, and get paid without chasing invoices.
Create creator profileMore creator guidesMake Influence
Briefs, agreed terms, tracking links and results sit together — so brands and creators see the same numbers.
See how it worksBrowse the Academy
