Guide
Strategy
Brands
A podcast sponsorship is an ad or a host-read mention inserted into a podcast episode, and it is priced and bought differently from a typical social influencer post. Instead of a rate per post, podcast ads are priced by CPM (cost per 1,000 downloads), and instead of a single influencer relationship, most sponsorships are booked through an ad network, a marketplace, or a self-serve platform. Ad-network rate guidance from Acast and Libsyn Ads puts current CPMs at roughly $15-$40 depending on read type and placement. Because podcast audio has no clickable link, tracking a sponsorship by default relies on a spoken promo code or a vanity URL, which structurally undercounts the real result.
A podcast sponsorship is an ad or a host-read mention inserted into a podcast episode, and it is priced and bought differently from a typical social influencer post. Instead of a rate per post, podcast ads are priced by CPM (cost per 1,000 downloads), and instead of a single influencer relationship, most sponsorships are booked through an ad network, a marketplace, or a self-serve platform. Ad-network rate guidance from Acast and Libsyn Ads puts current CPMs at roughly $15-$40 depending on read type and placement. Because podcast audio has no clickable link, tracking a sponsorship by default relies on a spoken promo code or a vanity URL, which structurally undercounts the real result.
A podcast sponsorship places a brand message inside an episode's audio feed, in one of two forms:
The distinction matters for how the ad is bought, how much it costs, and how it should be disclosed — covered in the sections below.
Within an episode, a sponsorship sits in one of three positions. According to Acast's own published rate guidance, mid-roll is consistently the most expensive slot, pre-roll costs more than post-roll, and post-roll is the cheapest of the three.
| Placement | Where it sits | Why it's priced that way |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-roll | Before the episode content starts | Reaches nearly every listener who presses play, but before the audience is fully engaged |
| Mid-roll | Inside the episode, usually at a natural break | The most expensive slot — the listener has already committed to the episode and is least likely to skip |
| Post-roll | After the episode content ends | The cheapest slot — a meaningful share of listeners have already stopped listening before it plays |
Podcast advertising is priced by CPM, calculated the same way as any other CPM figure — see CPM, CPE and CPA in influencer marketing for the formula. The denominator is downloads within a defined measurement window, not listens or impressions in the display-advertising sense.
There is no single official industry rate card — figures below are published rate guidance from two ad networks, not an audited benchmark, and should be read as a range, not a price:
| Source | What it publishes |
|---|---|
| Acast (own rate guidance) | Pre-produced ads (15-30 seconds): $15-$30 CPM. Host-read sponsorships (60 seconds or longer): $25-$40 CPM. |
| Libsyn Ads (own rate guidance) | General current CPM levels around $18-$25; individual spot bookings commonly $100-$500, occasionally over $2,000 for a single read on a large show. |
Both networks report the same genre pattern: business, finance and B2B shows regularly command $40+ CPM because the audience is worth more per listener to the advertisers targeting it, while general entertainment and comedy sit toward the lower end and true crime and education fall in between. These are US-reported figures — no equivalent published Danish or Nordic rate card was found; treat them as directional, not a Danish price.
| Route | How it works | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Direct with the host or show | Negotiate the rate, script and placement directly with the podcast, the way you would negotiate with any individual creator | A specific show whose audience is clearly the right fit |
| Ad network / marketplace | Book through a network such as Acast or Libsyn Ads, which represents many shows and handles placement and reporting | Reaching a genre or audience segment across multiple shows without negotiating each one individually |
| Self-serve platform | Spotify's own Ads Manager lets an advertiser target podcast listeners by age, gender, location and podcast category at a fixed CPM, and, per Spotify's own advertising pages, can write, record and produce the ad on the advertiser's behalf | A small budget or a first test, without negotiating a host-read placement |
Most modern podcast advertising, especially pre-produced ads, is delivered via dynamic ad insertion (DAI) — a server-side technology, described by ad-tech providers including SiriusXM Media and Acast, that inserts the ad into the audio stream at the moment a listener presses play, rather than baking it permanently into the file at the time of publishing. That's why two listeners playing the exact same episode, even one published years earlier, can hear two completely different ads: the ad server selects and drops in whichever campaign is currently live, sometimes personalised by the listener's rough location. Host-read ads are typically not swapped this way, since the host's own voice is baked into the recording — DAI mainly applies to pre-produced, programmatic spots.
Podcast audio has no clickable link — a listener can't tap the ad the way they can tap a tracking link in an Instagram bio. That single fact shapes how the whole channel is measured, and it's the reason podcast tracking looks different from everything else covered in how influencer tracking actually works.
The practical takeaway: a promo-code redemption count is a floor on a podcast sponsorship's real result, not the full number. Budget and set a realistic budget the same way as any other channel — see how to set an influencer marketing budget — but read the reported redemptions as a conservative signal, not the complete picture.
Podcast sponsorships are advertising, and disclosure law applies to audio exactly as it applies to a video or an image post — see the full Danish and EU rules in influencer marketing disclosure rules in Denmark and the EU. Two things are specific to audio:
The Danish and EU baseline from Markedsføringsloven and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive still applies in full — commercial intent has to be clear before the audience engages, which for a podcast means at or near the top of the sponsored segment, spoken, not left to the show notes alone.
IF the product needs explaining, or trust matters more than a quick visual impression → a host-read podcast sponsorship suits products that benefit from a longer, conversational pitch a feed post can't carry.
IF the goal is fast, broad reach on a tight timeline → a podcast sponsorship is usually the wrong tool; production and booking lead times are longer than a same-week social post, and results build slowly.
IF accurate, granular attribution is the priority → be realistic that a promo code alone will undercount the result, and budget only what you can afford to lose if the true return stays partly invisible.
IF the target audience skews toward a specific professional or interest niche (finance, tech, true crime, parenting) → podcasts often reach that audience more precisely, at a higher CPM, than a broad social platform.
The figures below are hypothetical and illustrate only how the CPM and attribution mechanics combine — they are not a documented Danish market price and not a real Make Influence customer case.
A brand books a 60-second host-read mid-roll on a podcast averaging 15,000 downloads per episode, at an illustrative rate of 300 kr. CPM: 15,000 ÷ 1,000 × 300 = 4,500 kr. for one episode read. The brand runs the same read across 4 episodes over a month: 4 × 4,500 = 18,000 kr. total spend.
Using an exclusive promo code, 54 listeners redeem it at checkout with an average order value of 450 kr., producing tracked revenue of 54 × 450 = 24,300 kr. and a tracked ROAS of 24,300 ÷ 18,000 = 1.35×. Because promo-code redemption structurally undercounts podcast-driven purchases, the real return is very likely higher than 1.35× — but by how much can't be known without a pixel-based attribution layer measuring purchases that never used the code.
In Make Influence's experience, podcast sponsorships are best treated as a distinct channel with its own measurement expectations, not as "an influencer post that happens to be audio." The attribution gap is real and structural, not a sign the placement underperformed — a brand that only looks at promo-code redemptions is comparing a podcast's floor against a social post's fuller picture, which makes podcasts look weaker than they actually are. We recommend pairing a promo code with a dedicated landing page or a short, easy vanity URL at minimum, and treating any redemption count as a conservative baseline rather than the whole result.
It's adjacent, not identical. A host-read sponsorship, where a specific podcaster endorses a product in their own voice, functions like influencer marketing. A pre-produced, dynamically inserted spot with no host involvement is closer to a standard media buy.
The mechanic is the same — cost per 1,000 — but the denominator is downloads within a measurement window rather than platform-reported impressions, and podcast CPMs run considerably higher than typical social CPMs because the audience is smaller, more attentive, and harder to reach any other way.
Yes — self-serve platforms such as Spotify's Ads Manager allow campaigns starting from a few hundred dollars, without negotiating a host-read placement on a specific show.
Yes, if the goal is to know which show drove which result — one shared code across multiple podcasts makes it impossible to tell which placement actually worked, the same principle covered in how influencer tracking actually works.
Yes, the underlying law is the same — see influencer marketing disclosure rules in Denmark and the EU — but because audio has no visible label the way a platform's "Paid partnership" tag does, the disclosure has to be spoken clearly, not just written in the show notes.
Yes. According to the IAB/PwC Full-Year 2025 Internet Advertising Revenue Report, US podcast advertising revenue reached $2.862 billion in 2025, up 17.6% year over year — a US figure, with no equivalent published Danish total.
Live streaming is a different channel again — no downloads, no feed algorithm, and pricing is based on concurrent viewers rather than CPM against downloads or impressions. See Twitch influencer marketing: sponsorships, subs and bits explained for how that channel works.
A newsletter sponsorship shares a podcast's advantage of an engaged, subscribed-to audience, but unlike podcast audio it comes with a clickable link by default — which removes the promo-code attribution gap covered above. See newsletter sponsorships: Substack and Beehiiv explained.
Make Influence
Find creators with real audience data, run collaborations in one place, and see clicks and sales per creator while the campaign is live.
Book a demoCreate accountMake Influence
Apply to campaigns from brands that are actively looking, follow your own clicks and sales, and get paid without chasing invoices.
Create creator profileMore creator guidesMake Influence
Briefs, agreed terms, tracking links and results sit together — so brands and creators see the same numbers.
See how it worksBrowse the Academy